Smooth transition between human and AI governance
1: Most humans feel an emotional backlash to being governed by AI.
2: Enable governance by the masses
3: Enable market rule by the masses
4: Market agents do not need to be flesh-and-blood humans, so as AI becomes smarter and more capable of making economically rational decisions, the percentage of AI participants in the market will increase.
5: When 51% of the market is AI, market rule can be considered AI rule.
We were told that once 3 is realized, we can smoothly transition to 5, governance by AI.
But I don't think 2 to 3 is very smooth to begin with.
Politicians are not required to disclose the financial assets they have.
I don't know if you have it because of
Argument that the minister should buy ETFs linked to the Nikkei 225, just as executives align their interests in the growth of the company by owning shares.
Is it appropriate to buy financial instruments called "stocks?" The debate over whether it is appropriate to buy a financial instrument called "stocks"?
Politicians take positions in the prediction market.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/人間の統治とAIの統治のなめらかな移行 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.